A Holistic View on the Pathology of Public Policy in Iran

Main Article Content

Lotfollah Foruzande
Ebrahim Hajipour

Abstract

The present study is an applied developmental study and from the point of view of data collection is a qualitative one. The strategy applied in this study is the grounded theory as a systematic and qualitative approach toward creating a hypothesis. The main aim the present study follows is to design a model for the pathology of running public policies in Iran. The data was collected through face to face, profound 60 to 90 minute interviews with 20 of prominent policy makers, executives and professors asking questions on challenges of running public policies. Sampling was conducted theoretically. Initially, a set of basic concepts were recollected via coding process and categories were extracted from them. Later, in axial coding stage, the relationship between these categories was determined through coding paradigm. Then, in the selective coding stage, each part of the model was explained. The advantage of this study over other works of research conducted on the pathology of running public policies is presenting a comprehensive and practical model attempting to consider all parameters affecting an unsuccessful public policy. The present study tries to demonstrate a holistic view and identify the challenges in public policy environment, challenges of the policy in public environment, and challenges of running a public policy ending in the failure of a public policy in order to elaborate on the outcomes of a failed policy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Foruzande, L., & Hajipour, E. (2019). A Holistic View on the Pathology of Public Policy in Iran. JMDMA, 1(2), 58-62. https://doi.org/10.3261212/2019.1.10
Section
Articles

References

1- Corbin, J.and Strauss, A. (2008). Basic of qualitative Research (3ed), Basic of qualitative research, Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand oask, USA: Sage

2- Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000) .Determining Validity in Qualitative Inquiry. Theory into Practice, Vol. 39.

3- Goodin, R.E., and Klingemann, H.-D. (eds) (1996). A New Handbook of Political Science. New York: Oxford
University Press

4- Hargrove, Barbara. (1980). Evil Eyes and Religious Choices. Society, 17, 3:

5- Hjern, B., Hanf, K and Porter, D. (1978). Local networks of manpower training the FRG and Sweden, Interorganizational policymaking , . London: Sage.

6- Héritier, A., Kerwer, D., Knill, C., Lehmkuhl, D., Teutsch, M., and Douillet, A.-C. (eds) (2001). Differential Europe. The European Union Impact on National Policymaking. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefi eld.